A colleague of mine, whom I respect very much, said the following:
From philosophy, to art, to science, to technique!
You cannot conceptualize without a philosophy on the subject, and then general dabbing in the matter is art, to rationalizing your initial experience, to perfecting it into a technique.
Is there a bias in this statement against art?
Would you instead say science is no doubt rational, but to apply it to life is essentially an art?
0 comments:
Post a Comment